geoviki ([identity profile] geoviki.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] geoviki 2005-05-05 11:45 pm (UTC)

I think you said a lot by calling sex a "tool", though. It's got to serve the story. I know a lot of writers will slap on the "PWP" label on stuff that's short and graphic. But to me, if the story's got a point to make, and the sex helps make that point, it's not just gratuitous smut. However, if it truly is just "oh, here they are, let's get it on", then I do lose interest. I've just read too much of it.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
No Subject Icon Selected
More info about formatting